================
@@ -177,6 +177,26 @@ static bool isLanguageDefinedBuiltin(const SourceManager
&SourceMgr,
return false;
}
+static bool isReservedAttrName(Preprocessor &PP, IdentifierInfo *II) {
----------------
AaronBallman wrote:
Maybe? I think they absolutely should, but those names are not portable to
other compilers.
(FWIW, I like what the C committee did:
6.7.13.1p4:
> In all aspects of the language, a standard attribute specified by this
> document as an identifier `attr`
and an identifier of the form `__attr__` shall behave the same when used as an
attribute token,
except for the spelling.
so standard library vendors can reliably use the underscored names under an
existing well-known identifier reservation rule without sacrificing
portability.)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106036
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
