================
@@ -36,9 +35,6 @@
// RUN: env SCE_ORBIS_SDK_DIR=.. %clang -Winvalid-or-nonexistent-directory
-### -emit-ast -isysroot foo -target x86_64-scei-ps4 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
-check-prefix=WARN-ISYSROOT -check-prefix=NO-WARN %s
// RUN: env SCE_ORBIS_SDK_DIR=.. %clang -Winvalid-or-nonexistent-directory
-### --sysroot=foo/ -isysroot foo -target x86_64-scei-ps4 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
-check-prefix=WARN-ISYSROOT -check-prefix=NO-WARN %s
-// RUN: env SCE_ORBIS_SDK_DIR=.. %clang -Winvalid-or-nonexistent-directory
-### -nostdlib -target x86_64-scei-ps4 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
-check-prefix=WARN-SYS-HEADERS -check-prefix=NO-WARN %s
-// RUN: env SCE_ORBIS_SDK_DIR=.. %clang -Winvalid-or-nonexistent-directory
-### -nodefaultlibs -target x86_64-scei-ps4 %s 2>&1 | FileCheck
-check-prefix=WARN-SYS-HEADERS -check-prefix=NO-WARN %s
----------------
playstation-edd wrote:
I generally favaour leaving the test as it would be if the code was like that
in the first place, as it avoids indefinite accumulation. Assuming the commit
goes in as thing stands, there's no more reason to check for interaction with
`-nodefaultlibs` as there is for interaction with `-nolibc` (which the code
ignores, currently). And so it also avoids hitches for the reader ("well _of
course_ there's no interaction with xyz... why would be checking it?").
With any luck, near future changes will go on to implement complete behaviour
for all these `-no...` switches for library control. At which point new
affirmative checks will be introduced.
With my case made, I'm also content to amend if we want that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107112
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
