c8ef wrote:

I'm curious about why Clang emits atomic-to-non-atomic and non-atomic-to-atomic 
conversions when the type of the expression is atomic and the input is also 
atomic. 
(I'm not very familiar with C++ expression rules, so I may have missed 
something in the standards.)

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106751
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to