kazutakahirata wrote: > It looks like this causes a compile-time regression. The clang thin link time > increases by 1% > (https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare_clang.php?from=9ccf82543d509bb5a0f5d0551fc4d6c1913b9a9b&to=5c0d61e318a77434487fcec8361d8110fb06e59d&stat=instructions%3Au). > There is no regression for thin link on CTMark, so the regression here > probably scales with the number of modules involved in the link, so is likely > even larger for larger applications.
Thank you for reporting this! Let me look into this. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106772 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
