================ @@ -2813,6 +2813,11 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitKCFIOperandBundle( Callee.getAbstractInfo().getCalleeFunctionProtoType(); if (FP) Bundles.emplace_back("kcfi", CGM.CreateKCFITypeId(FP->desugar())); + else { + ASTContext &context = this->getContext(); + QualType voidType = context.VoidTy; ---------------- samitolvanen wrote:
`VoidTy` doesn't seem like an appropriate type for a function even if it doesn't have a parameter type list. We still want to distinguish between different return types, right? Also, please add a matching test when you make a change. You could probably add a test case for this to `clang/test/CodeGen/kcfi.c`. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106677 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits