tarunprabhu wrote: > > To unblock you, I propose the following: > > 1. Keep this as is, but add a comment saying that this should be a proper > compiler option instead of a secret handshake like this. Similar comment > should be added in Clang. I will happily approve that. >
I have added a comment to both `clang` and `flang` indicating that we should eventually replace `mllvm -print-pipeline-passes` with a proper compiler driver option. I am happy to implement it, but it might have to wait for a bit, and I'd like to get the functionality in for now. Thanks for the review and suggestions, Andrzej. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106141 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
