philnik777 wrote: > > I did think about it more, and I think it would be more consistent to > > support the attribute on any sort of specializable entity, including > > functions - regardless of STL needs @AaronBallman @ldionne > > Agreed; if we're adding a custom attribute, we might as well support it in a > general form so users can also make use of it for their needs (which may be > different than STL needs).
While I don't see much of a use-case for functions, I also don't see much of a downside (assuming implementing the attribute is as simple for functions as it is for variables and classes). Is there anything else that can be specialized? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101469 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
