================ @@ -285,6 +288,50 @@ void SizeofExpressionCheck::registerMatchers(MatchFinder *Finder) { hasRHS(ignoringParenImpCasts(SizeOfExpr.bind("sizeof-ptr-div-expr")))) .bind("sizeof-in-ptr-arithmetic-div"), this); + + // SEI CERT ARR39-C. Do not add or subtract a scaled integer to a pointer. + // Detect sizeof, alignof and offsetof usage in pointer arithmetics where + // they are used to scale the numeric distance, which is scaled again by + // the pointer arithmetic operator. This can result in forming invalid + // offsets. + // + // Examples, where P is a pointer, N is some integer (both compile-time and + // run-time): P + sizeof(T), P + sizeof(*P), P + N * sizeof(*P). + // + // This check does not warn on cases where the pointee type is "1 byte", + // as those cases can often come from generics and also do not constitute a + // problem because the size does not affect the scale used. + const auto PtrArithmeticIgnoredPointeeTypes = qualType(anyOf( + asString("char"), asString("unsigned char"), asString("signed char"), + asString("int8_t"), asString("uint8_t"), asString("std::byte"), + asString("const char"), asString("const unsigned char"), + asString("const signed char"), asString("const int8_t"), + asString("const uint8_t"), asString("const std::byte"))); ---------------- nicovank wrote:
This is redundant since there is the condition `PointeeSize != 1` anyway. My 2 cents is to not explicitly have ignored types and instead keep ignoring anything that has size 1. Less special cases, more robust. Maybe the condition can be turned into a matcher, not sure if that's better performance-wise, I think it's fine as-is as a `check` condition. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106061 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits