================
@@ -8192,6 +8192,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
             Kind.getRange().getEnd());
       } else {
         CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+        // Note the return value isn't used to return early
+        // to preserve the AST as best as possible even though an error
+        // might have occurred. For struct initialization it also allows
+        // all field assignments to be checked rather than bailing on the
+        // first error.
+        S.BoundsSafetyCheckInitialization(Entity, Kind, Sema::AA_Initializing,
----------------
delcypher wrote:

The comment is explaining **why** we aren't checking the return value. If you 
remove it isn't obvious at all why its being ignored.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to