================
@@ -8192,6 +8192,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
Kind.getRange().getEnd());
} else {
CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type);
+ // Note the return value isn't used to return early
+ // to preserve the AST as best as possible even though an error
+ // might have occurred. For struct initialization it also allows
+ // all field assignments to be checked rather than bailing on the
+ // first error.
+ S.BoundsSafetyCheckInitialization(Entity, Kind, Sema::AA_Initializing,
----------------
delcypher wrote:
The comment is explaining **why** we aren't checking the return value. If you
remove it isn't obvious at all why its being ignored.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits