================ @@ -8192,6 +8192,14 @@ ExprResult InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S, Kind.getRange().getEnd()); } else { CurInit = new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type); + // Note the return value isn't used to return early + // to preserve the AST as best as possible even though an error + // might have occurred. For struct initialization it also allows + // all field assignments to be checked rather than bailing on the + // first error. + S.BoundsSafetyCheckInitialization(Entity, Kind, Sema::AA_Initializing, ---------------- delcypher wrote:
The comment is explaining **why** we aren't checking the return value. If you remove it isn't obvious at all why its being ignored. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106321 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits