================
@@ -11427,6 +11427,19 @@ static void AnalyzeImplicitConversions(
return;
}
+ if (auto *OutArgE = dyn_cast<HLSLOutArgExpr>(E)) {
+ // The base expression is only used to initialize the parameter for
+ // arguments to `inout` parameters, so we only traverse down the base
+ // expression for `inout` cases.
----------------
rjmccall wrote:
I specifically said the original l-value expression. I'm trying to make sure
we get warnings in sub-expressions of the l-value that have nothing to do with
the final conversion to produce the argument.
With that said:
> If SemaChecking traverses down both sides we get warnings for the conversion
> that would "initialize" the out parameter, but those warnings aren't accurate
> because no initialization occurs.
Isn't this an argument that you either (1) shouldn't visit the initialization
specifically for `out`, but should still do it for `inout`, or (2) shouldn't
generate the initialization expression for `out`?
Apropos, I know this is a future direction, but what semantics do you want for
C++ class types and `out`? Skipping the initialization entirely is definitely
incorrect — the callee will get passed a reference to an uninitialized object
and (presumably) start calling methods on it. Probably this should
default-initialize?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101083
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
