================
@@ -3056,18 +3014,26 @@ bool
ARMTargetLowering::IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(
// Exception-handling functions need a special set of instructions to
indicate
// a return to the hardware. Tail-calling another function would probably
// break this.
- if (CallerF.hasFnAttribute("interrupt"))
+ if (CallerF.hasFnAttribute("interrupt")) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "false (interrupt attribute)\n");
return false;
+ }
- if (canGuaranteeTCO(CalleeCC,
getTargetMachine().Options.GuaranteedTailCallOpt))
+ if (canGuaranteeTCO(CalleeCC,
+ getTargetMachine().Options.GuaranteedTailCallOpt)) {
+ LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << (CalleeCC == CallerCC ? "true" : "false")
+ << " (guaranteed tail-call CC)\n");
return CalleeCC == CallerCC;
+ }
// Also avoid sibcall optimization if either caller or callee uses struct
// return semantics.
bool isCalleeStructRet = Outs.empty() ? false : Outs[0].Flags.isSRet();
bool isCallerStructRet = MF.getFunction().hasStructRetAttr();
- if (isCalleeStructRet || isCallerStructRet)
+ if (isCalleeStructRet != isCallerStructRet) {
----------------
efriedma-quic wrote:
If you're going to allow the case where both the caller and callee are sret,
you need to check that the sret points to the same address.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102896
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
