dmitry added a comment. @yaxunl, we already have the similar issue for atomics. Probably we can extend typedef semantic checks but I don't think it's a good idea since C and C++ have the similar problem but they don't provide special treatment for types from their standard libraries. I think the proposed approach conforms to general practice and I also think that it's better than to check canonical type and therefore to restrict ndrange_t with a particular non-standard implementation or do you envision something different from the canonical type checking in mind?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28058 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
