================
@@ -5346,7 +5346,6 @@ static EvalStmtResult EvaluateStmt(StmtResult &Result,
EvalInfo &Info,
const Expr *RetExpr = cast<ReturnStmt>(S)->getRetValue();
FullExpressionRAII Scope(Info);
if (RetExpr && RetExpr->isValueDependent()) {
- EvaluateDependentExpr(RetExpr, Info);
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
I see. The problem is that in this case we can have incomplete substitutions.
For most of the template instantiator, this is not a problem since rebuilding
into any dependent stuff just suppresses further analysis, and we just discard
the result of the substitution since it was incomplete anyway.
This breaks down here because of the lambda, since a call to an incompletely
substituted lambda can come off as non-dependent, even though you would find
dependent stuff if you tried to evaluate it.
If the constant expression evaluator would treat finding any dependent stuff as
an error, this would come off ok. But since you pointed out there would need to
be more places to fix, I think what we could do instead is just bail out
immediately when we know we have an incomplete substitution.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100692
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
