https://github.com/mpark created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105784
The comment talks about left-associative operators twice, when the latter
mention is actually describing right-associative operators.
>From 9c90592726137fabbcbc7388b3ce0d4bc496bfc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Park <mcyp...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 22:14:19 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [NFC] Fix an incorrect comment about operator precedence.
The comment talks about left-associative operators twice, when
the latter mention is actually describing right-associative operators.
---
clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
index 1405aef700bec5..64f284d78b24db 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Parse/ParseExpr.cpp
@@ -607,7 +607,7 @@ Parser::ParseRHSOfBinaryExpression(ExprResult LHS,
prec::Level MinPrec) {
RHS = ExprError();
}
// If this is left-associative, only parse things on the RHS that bind
- // more tightly than the current operator. If it is left-associative, it
+ // more tightly than the current operator. If it is right-associative,
it
// is okay, to bind exactly as tightly. For example, compile A=B=C=D as
// A=(B=(C=D)), where each paren is a level of recursion here.
// The function takes ownership of the RHS.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
