================ @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 %s -verify -pedantic-errors +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 %s -verify -pedantic-errors -ast-dump | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 %s -verify -pedantic-errors -ast-dump | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 %s -verify -pedantic-errors -ast-dump | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %s -verify -pedantic-errors -ast-dump | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++23 %s -verify -pedantic-errors -ast-dump | FileCheck %s +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++26 %s -verify -pedantic-errors -ast-dump | FileCheck %s + +// expected-no-diagnostics +// cwg722: 20 ---------------- Endilll wrote:
We've been accepting this since Clang 9. Either the status is wrong and should be `9`, or the test has insufficient coverage. https://godbolt.org/z/Ysv3WP4Kv https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104704 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
