================
@@ -5663,6 +5663,8 @@ def err_explicit_instantiation_internal_linkage : Error<
def err_explicit_instantiation_not_known : Error<
"explicit instantiation of %0 does not refer to a function template, "
"variable template, member function, member class, or static data member">;
+def err_explicit_instantiation_no_candidate : Error<
+ "no candidate for explicit instantiation of %0">;
----------------
MitalAshok wrote:
There's notes in the example above, but yeah no reason to change everything in
this PR when it seems unrelated.
This message should say "no *viable* candidate" (or "no matching function").
Also you should be able to restructure stuff so that template/non template
member functions can use the same overload set, so would naturally use the same
diagnostic. For example, this:
```c++
template<typename>
struct A {
template<typename = void>
void f() requires(false);
void f() requires(false);
};
template void A<int>::f();
```
Should note both candidates, when I think your change means it only notes the
non-template candidate (and removing the non-template function means it notes
the template one, which seems strange)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104438
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
