mizvekov wrote: > Thinking twice, I think this is probably feasible to go. As an internal flag > wouldn't be exposed to users, but we might have to refactor the function a > lot more.
Yep. Just don't forget to assert in case the template arguments wouldn't get added, to diagnose users passing Innermost with a declaration which doesn't take template arguments :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102922 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
