mizvekov wrote: > I think using "broken" in the name of the diagnostic and the internal option > is a bit problematic -- that's too much of a value judgement, IMO. After all, > the previous functionality worked well enough for those folks. > > > > Would it make more sense to name it something along the lines of "retain > substitution ast nodes"?
Thanks. My intention was mostly to discourage users from trying it, without at least looking sideways. Though I am fine with the name change. Thanks for fixing the commit up. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102510 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
