martinboehme wrote:

> Nope, there is no reliable way to "survey users". Default behavior of checks 
> changes every release. Some checks are getting limited, by excluding some use 
> cases, some checks are getting extended. In this case situation is easy. 
> Users will update Clang-tidy, and if check will report "new issues", they 
> have an option, to fix them or look into release notes to find out what 
> changed in check and then change configuration to revert back to previous 
> behavior. This is how things were handled in past for other checks.

OK, in that case this sounds fine.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94869
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to