martinboehme wrote: > Nope, there is no reliable way to "survey users". Default behavior of checks > changes every release. Some checks are getting limited, by excluding some use > cases, some checks are getting extended. In this case situation is easy. > Users will update Clang-tidy, and if check will report "new issues", they > have an option, to fix them or look into release notes to find out what > changed in check and then change configuration to revert back to previous > behavior. This is how things were handled in past for other checks.
OK, in that case this sounds fine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94869 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits