================ @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@ +//===--- ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.cpp - clang-tidy --------===// +// +// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions. +// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information. +// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception +// +//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// + +#include "ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses.h" +#include "../utils/Matchers.h" +#include "../utils/OptionsUtils.h" +#include "clang/ASTMatchers/ASTMatchFinder.h" +#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h" +#include <numeric> + +using namespace clang::ast_matchers; + +namespace clang::tidy::cppcoreguidelines { + +static constexpr std::array<llvm::StringRef, 3> SubscriptDefaultExclusions = { + llvm::StringRef("::std::map"), llvm::StringRef("::std::unordered_map"), + llvm::StringRef("::std::flat_map")}; + +ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses:: + ProBoundsAvoidUncheckedContainerAccesses(StringRef Name, + ClangTidyContext *Context) + : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context) { + + SubscriptExcludedClasses = clang::tidy::utils::options::parseStringList( ---------------- PBHDK wrote:
If we were just to rely on the `const` check, we would also be excluding std::vectors for instance, because their subscript operator might not be `const` either, as it returns a reference. Correct? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95220 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
