================
@@ -5443,24 +5444,38 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitRValueForField(LValue LV,
//===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitCallExpr(const CallExpr *E,
- ReturnValueSlot ReturnValue) {
+ ReturnValueSlot ReturnValue,
+ llvm::CallBase **CallOrInvoke) {
+ llvm::CallBase *CallOrInvokeStorage;
+ if (!CallOrInvoke) {
+ CallOrInvoke = &CallOrInvokeStorage;
+ }
+
+ auto AddCoroMustElideOnExit = llvm::make_scope_exit([&] {
+ if (E->isCoroMustElide()) {
+ auto *I = *CallOrInvoke;
+ if (I)
+ I->addFnAttr(llvm::Attribute::CoroMustElide);
----------------
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
I agree the current style is more or less potential to scale. But I'd like to
hear from @efriedma-quic since the patch changes a lot of CodeGen's functions
signature and I want to know if he will be happy about this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99282
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
