================
@@ -5443,24 +5444,38 @@ RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitRValueForField(LValue LV,
//===--------------------------------------------------------------------===//
RValue CodeGenFunction::EmitCallExpr(const CallExpr *E,
- ReturnValueSlot ReturnValue) {
+ ReturnValueSlot ReturnValue,
+ llvm::CallBase **CallOrInvoke) {
+ llvm::CallBase *CallOrInvokeStorage;
+ if (!CallOrInvoke) {
+ CallOrInvoke = &CallOrInvokeStorage;
+ }
+
+ auto AddCoroMustElideOnExit = llvm::make_scope_exit([&] {
+ if (E->isCoroMustElide()) {
+ auto *I = *CallOrInvoke;
+ if (I)
+ I->addFnAttr(llvm::Attribute::CoroMustElide);
----------------
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
It looks like all the changes in CodeGen are served for this. And I am a little
concerned about if it is worthy to do such a big change for this.
@efriedma-quic could you take a look here?
And I am wondering if all of the Emit*CallExpr function will be converged to
one or a few fundamental functions to emit the CallInst like `EmitCall` then we
can do our job there.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99282
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
