jhuber6 wrote:

> I imagine the better fix would be to either overload the intrinsic or make it 
> return a pointer in the global address space, depending on whether it's 
> semantics tied to globals or this is just an implementation choice.

It's definitely tied to globals for `noop` in this case, so I did what you 
suggested. I think we should apply this to a lot of the other ones, but they 
should be separate patches and this solves my immediate problem.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102096
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to