================
@@ -671,10 +671,8 @@ static void InitializeCPlusPlusFeatureTestMacros(const
LangOptions &LangOpts,
LangOpts.CPlusPlus23 ? "202211L"
: LangOpts.CPlusPlus17 ? "201603L"
: "200907");
- Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_static_assert", LangOpts.CPlusPlus26 ? "202306L"
- : LangOpts.CPlusPlus17
- ? "201411L"
- : "200410");
+ // C++17 / C++26 static_assert backported
+ Builder.defineMacro("__cpp_static_assert", "202306L");
----------------
philnik777 wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what's ambiguous here. You say yourself that it specifies
what the value should be for a given standards version. I also can't find
anything suggesting that implementations are allowed to define then to
something else. Anyways, since we seem to agree that implementations should be
allowed to define them to some higher number, I'm not sure it makes a ton of
sense to do anything other than filing an issue. But where should it be filed?
Is that core wording or library? Both? Neither?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102044
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
