================
@@ -258,6 +259,13 @@ static void getARMMultilibFlags(const Driver &D,
}
}
+static void getRISCVMultilibFlags(const Driver &D, const llvm::Triple &Triple,
+ const llvm::opt::ArgList &Args,
+ Multilib::flags_list &Result) {
+ Result.push_back("-march=" + riscv::getRISCVArch(Args, Triple));
----------------
lenary wrote:
the discourse thread also contains suggestions about splitting up each
extension into a different flag - I'm not opposed to an approach like that
either, and it might make creating a multilib config which matches the existing
behaviour a lot easier.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98856
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
