================
@@ -9193,6 +9207,63 @@ StmtResult
TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformOMPExecutableDirective(
AssociatedStmt.get(), D->getBeginLoc(), D->getEndLoc());
}
+/// This is mostly the same as above, but allows 'informational' class
+/// directives when rebuilding the stmt. It still takes an
+/// OMPExecutableDirective-type argument because we're reusing that as the
+/// superclass for the 'assume' directive at present, instead of defining a
+/// mostly-identical OMPInformationalDirective parent class.
+template <typename Derived>
+StmtResult TreeTransform<Derived>::TransformOMPInformationalDirective(
+ OMPExecutableDirective *D) {
+
+ // Transform the clauses
+ llvm::SmallVector<OMPClause *, 16> TClauses;
+ ArrayRef<OMPClause *> Clauses = D->clauses();
+ TClauses.reserve(Clauses.size());
+ for (ArrayRef<OMPClause *>::iterator I = Clauses.begin(), E = Clauses.end();
+ I != E; ++I) {
----------------
alexey-bataev wrote:
```suggestion
for (OMPClause *C : Clauses) {
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92731
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
