================
@@ -5407,6 +5407,9 @@ def note_dependent_function_template_spec_discard_reason
: Note<
"candidate ignored: %select{not a function template|"
"not a member of the enclosing %select{class template|"
"namespace; did you mean to explicitly qualify the specialization?}1}0">;
+def warn_diag_specialization : Warning<
+ "specializing a template which should not be specialized">,
----------------
Sirraide wrote:
I fee; like rephrasing it to something along the lines of ‘'X' should not be
specialised’ would make it a bit clearer what the problem is.
‘Specialising a template which should not be specialised’ is probably a bit
unclear to anyone who doesn’t already know about this rule, whereas e.g.
‘`std::something` should not be specialised’ imo makes it clearer what exactly
the problem here is (i.e. that *particular* template should not be specialised).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101469
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
