================ @@ -342,6 +342,57 @@ template <class T> class OMPVarListClause : public OMPClause { } }; +template <class T> class OMPDirectiveListClause : public OMPClause { ---------------- jtb20 wrote:
The idea was to factor out common functionality shared by absent/contains clauses. It doesn't do a huge amount, admittedly, but I think it's still better than copy/pasting a bunch of code for the absent/contains clause classes. (OMPNoChildClause, OMPOneStmtClause are similar in intent though perhaps wider in applicability). It should probably have a comment, if that's what you meant! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92731 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits