================
@@ -2581,6 +2581,60 @@ void NeonEmitter::runVectorTypes(raw_ostream &OS) {
OS << "typedef double float64_t;\n";
OS << "#endif\n\n";
+ OS << R"(
+typedef uint64_t fpm_t;
+
+enum __ARM_FPM_FORMAT { __ARM_FPM_E5M2, __ARM_FPM_E4M3 };
+
+enum __ARM_FPM_OVERFLOW { __ARM_FPM_INFNAN, __ARM_FPM_SATURATE };
+
+static __inline__ fpm_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__arm_fpm_init(void) {
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static __inline__ fpm_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__arm_set_fpm_src1_format(fpm_t __fpm, enum __ARM_FPM_FORMAT __format) {
+ return (__fpm & ~7ull) | (fpm_t)__format;
+}
+
+static __inline__ fpm_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__arm_set_fpm_src2_format(fpm_t __fpm, enum __ARM_FPM_FORMAT __format) {
+ return (__fpm & ~0x38ull) | ((fpm_t)__format << 3u);
+}
+
+static __inline__ fpm_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__arm_set_fpm_dst_format(fpm_t __fpm, enum __ARM_FPM_FORMAT __format) {
+ return (__fpm & ~0x1c0ull) | ((fpm_t)__format << 6u);
+}
+
+static __inline__ fpm_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__arm_set_fpm_overflow_mul(fpm_t __fpm, enum __ARM_FPM_OVERFLOW __behaviour) {
+ return (__fpm & ~0x4000ull) | ((fpm_t)__behaviour << 14u);
+}
+
+static __inline__ fpm_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__arm_set_fpm_overflow_cvt(fpm_t __fpm, enum __ARM_FPM_OVERFLOW __behaviour) {
+ return (__fpm & ~0x8000ull) | ((fpm_t)__behaviour << 15u);
+}
+
+static __inline__ fpm_t __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
+__arm_set_fpm_lscale(fpm_t __fpm, uint64_t __scale) {
+ return (__fpm & ~0x7f0000ull) | (__scale << 16u);
----------------
SpencerAbson wrote:
True, I'll leave it to your judgement! - Though there is also an argument for
consistent behavior.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100608
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
