MaskRay wrote: > all previous proposals to add such "re-run" protection ended up with "the > pipeline is wrong". But implementation is so trivial, so I don't mind just to > have it implemented.
While the implementation is trivial, I also share the concern whether sanitizers should do this. There are many other instrumentation passes. Do they all need something like this? I feel this change hasn't been well motivated. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99439 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
