mizvekov wrote: > @AaronBallman @cor3ntin @mizvekov So, I've made improvements to our > implementation of `isTemplateArgumentList` (not on this branch) that allow us > to issue a warning instead of an error for most of the cases where applying > the DR breaks existing code: >
That's great, thanks for following up on this! I am still concerned about the double error on the `t.A<1 < 4>::x` example. The ideal outcome would be to turn the second error into a note. How feasible to fix you think that is? Otherwise, I don't think this is a blocker for merging this, we can improve it on a follow up patch. > Since we can look past the potential _template-argument-list_ in most cases, > we could probably apply CWG1835 in all language modes with minimal impact on > existing code. Yes, I would certainly support that! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100425 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
