MitalAshok wrote: > Based on https://godbolt.org/z/n6oPdMT91, I think `3.1` is the correct > availability here, but I can be persuaded for `3.0`.
The warnings are because of how the test is written, the tested behaviour ("function types are never const or volatile") is still true in Clang 3.0 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100747 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits