MitalAshok wrote:

> Based on https://godbolt.org/z/n6oPdMT91, I think `3.1` is the correct 
> availability here, but I can be persuaded for `3.0`.

The warnings are because of how the test is written, the tested behaviour 
("function types are never const or volatile") is still true in Clang 3.0

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100747
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to