AaronBallman wrote: > > > @AaronBallman That's a good point, I didn't account for how defaulted > > > template arguments aren't printed. Would using `<*>` ~or a more rustic > > > approach of `<_>`~ be a good alternative? > > > > > > I was thinking about that, but I keep coming around to wondering whether it > > might make sense to support a regex there instead of a custom syntax. That > > seems like it gives users a bit more power without requiring them to write > > additional matchers, but perhaps that's a bad idea for performance > > reasons... > > We already have a `matchesName` matcher that would be able to handle any case > you want to throw at it, but there is definitely some performance concerns > with it. This is here to simply the basic case where you just want to match > any template which should be helpful for most cases.
Okay, that's a good point! Hmm, then yeah, I think `*` makes sense as a glob; `_` is a loaded term because of https://wg21.link/P2169 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100349 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
