rorth wrote: At least in the short term. ISTM that `clang++` may need to do something along the lines of Bug 33767 (resp. the underlying GCC bug/patch), otherwise users are in for a nasty surprise.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99075 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
