Artem-B wrote: @nico: > Why do we need a new binary for this, instead of having something like `clang > -cc1_nvlink` that calls a custom mode within clang?
Do we have existing precedents for such built-in tools, other than cc1 itself? If the linker wrapper can be part of clang itself, it would make some things easier logistically. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96561 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
