AaronBallman wrote: > > > @alanzhao1 do you think it's reasonable for the workaround to only apply > > > to code in system headers, or does the NDK get included as regular > > > headers generally? > > > > > > Having it only apply to system headers should be OK - in our case, chrome > > imports these headers as part of a `--sysroot`, which IIRC treats warnings > > the same way as `-isystem` > > > Do you need us to revert the changes while we resolve this? > > > > > > If you can revert while working on a solution, that would be helpful. > > We (Chrome) no longer need a revert - we patched the NDK locally.
Thank you for letting us know! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70307 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
