================ @@ -1122,7 +1157,7 @@ MallocChecker::performKernelMalloc(const CallEvent &Call, CheckerContext &C, if (TrueState && !FalseState) { SVal ZeroVal = C.getSValBuilder().makeZeroVal(Ctx.CharTy); return MallocMemAux(C, Call, Call.getArgExpr(0), ZeroVal, TrueState, - AF_Malloc); + AllocationFamily(AF_Malloc)); ---------------- steakhal wrote:
Now I get what you meant when pushed back on adding `explicit`. I didn't expect this to cause such a widespread effect. Sorry. Now that you made all the necessary changes, we can keep it as-is. You decide if you prefer reverting these back. I'm good either way. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98941 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits