================
@@ -1122,7 +1157,7 @@ MallocChecker::performKernelMalloc(const CallEvent &Call, 
CheckerContext &C,
   if (TrueState && !FalseState) {
     SVal ZeroVal = C.getSValBuilder().makeZeroVal(Ctx.CharTy);
     return MallocMemAux(C, Call, Call.getArgExpr(0), ZeroVal, TrueState,
-                        AF_Malloc);
+                        AllocationFamily(AF_Malloc));
----------------
steakhal wrote:

Now I get what you meant when pushed back on adding `explicit`. I didn't expect 
this to cause such a widespread effect. Sorry. Now that you made all the 
necessary changes, we can keep it as-is. You decide if you prefer reverting 
these back. I'm good either way.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98941
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to