Endilll wrote: > Out of curiosity, how does the current division of Sema fit into the "unique > language dialect" classification? I've noticed there are a bunch of > architecture specific Sema classes (e.g. SemaRISCV, SemaX86) and those don't > really fit the classification.
They are a different group of `Sema` parts, dedicated for backend-specific code. `SemaX86` and `SemaARM` serve as a good example of what a populated backend-specific part looks like. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98954 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
