================
@@ -60,6 +67,41 @@ void testMalloc8() {
operator delete[](p); // expected-warning{{Memory allocated by malloc()
should be deallocated by free(), not operator delete[]}}
}
+void testMalloc9() {
+ int *p = (int *)my_malloc(sizeof(int));
+ my_free(p); // no warning
+}
+
+void testMalloc10() {
+ int *p = (int *)my_malloc1(sizeof(int));
+ my_free1(p); // no warning
+}
+
+void testMalloc11() {
+ int *p = (int *)my_malloc2(sizeof(int));
+ my_free23(p); // no warning
+}
+
+void testMalloc12() {
+ int *p = (int *)my_malloc1(sizeof(int));
+ my_free(p); // expected-warning{{Memory allocated by my_malloc1() should be
deallocated by function that takes ownership of 'malloc1', not my_free(), which
takes ownership of 'malloc'}}
----------------
pskrgag wrote:
"malloc" and "malloc1" here means allocation classes (i.e. argument of
`ownership_{returns,takes}`, so I decided to wrap them with quotes to make them
look different from function names.
Do you think it's worth wrapping function names as well?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98941
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
