sdkrystian wrote: @cor3ntin Well, if the alternative is not implementing the resolution at all I'll look into the feasibility of identifying missing `template` keywords in the non-type template parameter case. If I can get that working, I think it's pretty safe to reland this patch.
Also, I replied to your post on the core reflector. I find it rather unlikely that CWG will implement a mitigation mechanism as doing so would effectively revert the resolution to CWG1835. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98547 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
