alexfh added inline comments.

================
Comment at: docs/clang-tidy/index.rst:558
+typically the basic `CHECK` forms (`CHECK-MESSAGES` and `CHECK-FIXES`)
+are sufficient for matcher tests.  Note that the `FileCheck`
+documentation mostly assumes the default prefix (`CHECK`), and hence
----------------
I'm not sure the term "matcher tests" is used anywhere else in our 
documentation. And it doesn't seem obvious to me either (if it refers to AST 
matchers, then it's just an implementation detail of clang-tidy checks, if it 
refers to the check patterns, then it's not a commonly used term for those 
either). I don't know what would be a good short replacement, maybe "clang-tidy 
lit tests" or just "clang-tidy tests".


https://reviews.llvm.org/D28189



_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to