rjmccall wrote: Given all that, I feel pretty comfortable relying on using LLVM's `i96` stores and so on. I do worry some that we're eventually going to run into a target where the `_BitInt` ABI does not match what LLVM wants to generate for `i96` load/store, but we should be able to generalize this so that targets can override the `_BitInt` operations pretty easily.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91364 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
