dcci wrote: > > > You should also add test coverage (clang/test/SemaCXX) for the changes > > > and a release note (clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst). > > > > > > @AaronBallman -- are you OK with a crash-on-invalid (the one in first > > post)? The original example we had crashed on valid code, but reducing a > > 35MB file with a lot of SFINAE is taking weeks with c-reduce. Thanks for > > your review :) > > Ideally we'd have test coverage for both the crash-on-invalid and > crash-on-valid code, if possible. If we can't get a reduction to a > crash-on-valid case, then crash-on-invalid that also fixes the valid case > would be okay. But we could perhaps help reduce the crash-on-valid code if > you can share it.
Thank you Aaron. Unfortunately this is from some Meta internal codebase, so it's hard to share. I'm trying to reduce myself. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98102 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits