dcci wrote:

> > > You should also add test coverage (clang/test/SemaCXX) for the changes 
> > > and a release note (clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst).
> > 
> > 
> > @AaronBallman -- are you OK with a crash-on-invalid (the one in first 
> > post)? The original example we had crashed on valid code, but reducing a 
> > 35MB file with a lot of SFINAE is taking weeks with c-reduce. Thanks for 
> > your review :)
> 
> Ideally we'd have test coverage for both the crash-on-invalid and 
> crash-on-valid code, if possible. If we can't get a reduction to a 
> crash-on-valid case, then crash-on-invalid that also fixes the valid case 
> would be okay. But we could perhaps help reduce the crash-on-valid code if 
> you can share it.

Thank you Aaron. Unfortunately this is from some Meta internal codebase, so 
it's hard to share. I'm trying to reduce myself.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98102
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to