On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:41 PM Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> ==============================================================================
> --- cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td (original)
> +++ cfe/trunk/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td Thu Dec 22
> 19:30:39 2016
> @@ -3343,6 +3343,10 @@ def note_ovl_candidate_incomplete_deduct
> def note_ovl_candidate_inconsistent_deduction : Note<
> "candidate template ignored: deduced conflicting
> %select{types|values|"
> "templates}0 for parameter %1%diff{ ($ vs. $)|}2,3">;
> +def note_ovl_candidate_inconsistent_deduction_types : Note<
> + "candidate template ignored: deduced values %diff{"
> + "of conflicting types for parameter %0 (%1 of type $ vs. %3 of type
> $)|"
> + "%1 and %3 of conflicting types for parameter %0|}2,4">;
>
So, this new diagnostic isn't actually covered by any test. Not just is the
wording not covered, literally it isn't emitted. There is a bug in the
format that we didn't defend against -- having too many '|'s in the %diff
alternatives. I added an assert to try to catch this in r290417 and it
didn't trigger here because we never process this format.
Could you add a test covering this?
I went ahead and fixed the %diff format syntax by inspection in r290417.
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
