llvm-beanz wrote: > The grammer looks exactly the same with modules. May it be compatible with > modules?
The grammar is the same (although HLSL only supports the `export` keyword in a subset of the places C++ does), but the behavior isn't the same. We may look to shift HLSL's behavior to match C++ in the future but for compatibility with existing code we need to support the HLSL behavior. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96823 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
