goldsteinn wrote: > > This patch causes some significant performance regressions on > > llvm-test-suite (rv64gc-O3-thinlto): > > Name Before After Ratio > > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/Shootout-random 2.150161677 > > 3.300161641 + 53.5% > > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/kernels/trisolv/trisolv > > 0.111845159 0.145389494 +30.0% > > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/functionobjects 5.489498263 > > 6.827863965 +24.4% > > It has been fixed. But this patch didn't show a positive net effect :(
Does that mean it has a negative net effect, or its neutral (in which case the original motivating case should be enough). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96620 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
