graydon added inline comments.
================
Comment at: test/Modules/implicit-private-with-different-name.m:13
+//
expected-warning@Inputs/implicit-private-with-different-name/A.framework/Modules/module.private.modulemap:1{{top-level
module 'APrivate' in private module map, expected a submodule of 'A'}}
+//
expected-note@Inputs/implicit-private-with-different-name/A.framework/Modules/module.private.modulemap:1{{make
'APrivate' a submodule of 'A' to ensure it can be found by name}}
+// CHECK:
fix-it:"{{.*}}/Inputs/implicit-private-with-different-name/A.framework/Modules/module.private.modulemap":{1:18-1:26}:"A.Private"
----------------
bruno wrote:
> I think we can enhance the usability a bit here, how about:
>
> warning: top-level module 'APrivate' in private module map, expected a
> submodule of 'A'
> note: make 'APrivate' a submodule of 'A' to ensure it can be found by name
> framework module APrivate {
> ^
> A.Private
>
>
I'm not sure what you're requesting; as far as I can see that is exactly the
diagnostic I'm emitting (along with the fixit)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D27852
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
