llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT--> @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman) <details> <summary>Changes</summary> This updates Clang's extension criteria to explicitly mention impacts on other projects within the monorepo. These changes were discussed in the following RFC: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-require-discussion-of-impact-to-monorepo-stakeholders-when-adding-new-clang-extensions/79613 --- Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96532.diff 1 Files Affected: - (modified) clang/www/get_involved.html (+6) ``````````diff diff --git a/clang/www/get_involved.html b/clang/www/get_involved.html index 3fc688837d0bc..99fa03abb6234 100755 --- a/clang/www/get_involved.html +++ b/clang/www/get_involved.html @@ -126,6 +126,12 @@ <h2 id="criteria">Contributing Extensions to Clang</h2> extension is not broken by ongoing maintenance in Clang. The test suite should be complete enough that another compiler vendor could conceivably validate their implementation of the feature against it.</li> + + <li>A support story for other impacted projects within the monorepo: If the + extension can impact other parts of the project (libc++, lldb, compiler-rt, + etc), the proposal needs to document the impact for these projects to fully + support the extension and what level of support is expected. The impacted + project communities need to agree with that plan.</li> </ol> </div> `````````` </details> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96532 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
