Sirraide wrote: > Why gnu99 mode and not gnu89 mode? I see GCC has that behavior, but I'm not > certain why.
We went over this a while back: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88265#discussion_r1571088366 > I'm not certain there's any harm in always supporting raw string literals > from dependency scanning, so we could probably do that in the worst case. But my concerns from https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93753#issuecomment-2173666602 are still relevant too. CC @jansvoboda11 :+1: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88265 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
