================
@@ -738,16 +738,47 @@ Parser::DeclGroupPtrTy Parser::ParseUsingDeclaration(
return nullptr;
}
- if (!Tok.is(tok::identifier)) {
+ Decl *UED = nullptr;
+
+ if (Tok.is(tok::identifier)) {
----------------
cor3ntin wrote:
This assumes that only 2 scenario will occur:
* Either there is an already annotated template
* Or the identifier is not part of a simple-template-id
I am not sure that is correct.
ie there is scenario where we find a `tok::less` after the identifier.
I'd like to understand exactly what happens, in particular:
* Whether that scenario can ever happen (and we should assert otherwise)
* What's the difference between this code and `ParseBaseTypeSpecifier`: Either
we can remove a lot of code from `ParseBaseTypeSpecifier`, or factorize both
functions
Afaict, we always get an annotation because `ParseOptionalCXXScopeSpecifier`
annotates.
but that should be the case in `ParseBaseTypeSpecifier` too/
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95399
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
